Renewing an Existing Steam Boiler with Clayton: Space Saving + TCO Reality Check (for Steam people)

Most facilities don’t replace steam equipment simply to have a new steam boiler. Replacement usually happens because an aging firetube or water tube boiler unit occupies significant floor space, requires extensive operator attention, consumes more fuel than it should, keeps running even in weekends or nights and, simply, no longer aligns with current load profiles.

A boiler renewal offers an opportunity to reassess not only the pressure vessel, but the broader steam-system approach.

Clayton’s steam generator, forced-circulation coil design represents a different boiler configuration and operating model compared with traditional units.

Space saving isn’t “nice to have” anymore

Footprint: coil + separator vs shell + drum

A conventional firetube boiler is a pressure vessel full of water. That makes:

large diameter shell
big steam release area
clearances for doors, tube pulls, refractory access
heavy foundations and often a dedicated building

Clayton changes this. The heating surface is a spiral tube coil with a small internal water content, plus a high-efficiency steam separator.

The consequence is a radically smaller unit due to the low water content. This also has an impact on the safety regulations to follow.

Boiler house integration

A clayton steam generator requires minimal space, with lower weight enabling installation in constrained areas or even on upper floors.

That matters when renewing existing plants because you can:

reuse the existing boiler room without civil rebuild
avoid roof penetrations / chimney relocations
free up high-value floor area for production, utilities, or logistics

Modular skid / container options

The product range supports skid and containerized boiler houses, “turnkey solutions”, drastically reducing required installation area and time.

For renewals, that means you can:

stage a new unit alongside the old one
cut over during a short outage
keep the old boiler as backup without expanding the room

Space takeaway: You’re not just shrinking a boiler; you’re shrinking the project: foundations, building volume, access corridors, and expansion allowances.

Where the TCO savings actually come from

TCO is never one lever. It’s a bundle of small deltas that compound over 10–20 years. Clayton’s design hits several of the big ones simultaneously.

Standby losses drop because there is no water tank to keep hot

Firetubes hate cycling. They store a lot of hot water, so every shutdown is “wasted heat,” and every restart is a long warm-up that operators avoid—so the boiler sits at warm standby burning fuel.

Clayton starts from cold to full steam in about 5 minutes

and can sit on cold standby without penalty. So plants can match steam generation to actual demand curves.

Fuel logic:

Firetube: high inertia → forced warm standby → idle losses
Clayton: low water content + fast response → true steam-on-demand

Even if steady-state efficiencies were identical (they’re not), eliminating warm standby is a major annual fuel win for variable-load sites.

Heat transfer efficiency is inherently higher

Clayton’s counterflow principle maximizes heat transfer between water and heat.

Because the unit is compact, radiation and convection losses are < 0.5%, improving net efficiency and reducing running cost.

Blowdown is low, so you stop throwing money down the drain

Clayton separators run high TDS concentration (≈5× typical), so blowdown volume is much lower.

Documents explicitly link this to fuel, chemical, and water savings.

Cost logic:

less hot water dumped → less fuel to reheat makeup
fewer treatment chemicals → lower OPEX
less makeup → lower water + sewer costs
less thermal shock → longer component life

Maintenance and compliance overhead shrink

A small once-through coil has:

fewer pressure-part failure modes
simpler inspection scope
minimal descaling opportunity because water content is low and circulation is forced

Direct TCO impacts:

lower annual service spent
fewer internal operator hours
reduced inspection downtime
smaller spares inventory

Reliability value: “downtime cost” often dwarfs fuel

Because a Clayton steam generator ramps quickly and has a turndown ratio of up to 1/8 without pressure sag, process stability improves, often reducing scrap and rework in thermal processes. Rapid response is called out as inherent to forced circulation.

That’s hard to put on a brochure, but easy to see in plants that run batch or high-variance loads.

Bottom line

Renewing a legacy boiler with a Clayton system isn’t just swapping a heat source. It’s converting steam from a big, slow, space-hungry utility to a fast, modular “steam machine.”

Space saving:

1/3 space for same capacity due to smaller pressure boundary + light, modular packaging → reclaim plant real estate and avoid civil works.

TCO saving :

Steam-on-demand cuts standby fuel, compactness cuts losses, ultra-low blowdown cuts water/chem spend, and simplicity cuts maintenance + labour, lead up to 30% savings.

Discover all our products

Products

Industries

Services

Renewing an Existing Steam Boiler with Clayton: Space Saving + TCO Reality Check